perf_counter, powerpc, sparc: Fix compilation after perf_counter_overflow() change
Commit 5622f295
("x86, perf_counter, bts: Optimize BTS overflow
handling") removed the regs field from struct perf_sample_data and
added a regs parameter to perf_counter_overflow(). This breaks the
build on powerpc (and Sparc) as reported by Sachin Sant:
arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c: In function 'record_and_restart':
arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c:1165: error: unknown field 'regs' specified in initializer
This adjusts arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c to correspond with the
new struct perf_sample_data and perf_counter_overflow().
[ v2: also fix Sparc, Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com> ]
Reported-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <19127.8400.376239.586120@drongo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Ingo Molnar
parent
a1792cdaca
commit
cd74c86bdf
@@ -1162,7 +1162,6 @@ static void record_and_restart(struct perf_counter *counter, unsigned long val,
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (record) {
|
||||
struct perf_sample_data data = {
|
||||
.regs = regs,
|
||||
.addr = 0,
|
||||
.period = counter->hw.last_period,
|
||||
};
|
||||
@@ -1170,7 +1169,7 @@ static void record_and_restart(struct perf_counter *counter, unsigned long val,
|
||||
if (counter->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR)
|
||||
perf_get_data_addr(regs, &data.addr);
|
||||
|
||||
if (perf_counter_overflow(counter, nmi, &data)) {
|
||||
if (perf_counter_overflow(counter, nmi, &data, regs)) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Interrupts are coming too fast - throttle them
|
||||
* by setting the counter to 0, so it will be
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user