[PATCH] um: fix confusion irq early reenabling
Fix confusion about call context - comments and code are inconsistent and plain wrong, my fault. Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Acked-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Linus Torvalds
parent
b53378856f
commit
ec0ac8ad33
@@ -370,10 +370,10 @@ static irqreturn_t line_write_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
|
|||||||
struct tty_struct *tty = line->tty;
|
struct tty_struct *tty = line->tty;
|
||||||
int err;
|
int err;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* Interrupts are enabled here because we registered the interrupt with
|
/* Interrupts are disabled here because we registered the interrupt with
|
||||||
* IRQF_DISABLED (see line_setup_irq).*/
|
* IRQF_DISABLED (see line_setup_irq).*/
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
spin_lock_irq(&line->lock);
|
spin_lock(&line->lock);
|
||||||
err = flush_buffer(line);
|
err = flush_buffer(line);
|
||||||
if (err == 0) {
|
if (err == 0) {
|
||||||
return IRQ_NONE;
|
return IRQ_NONE;
|
||||||
@@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ static irqreturn_t line_write_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
|
|||||||
line->head = line->buffer;
|
line->head = line->buffer;
|
||||||
line->tail = line->buffer;
|
line->tail = line->buffer;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
spin_unlock_irq(&line->lock);
|
spin_unlock(&line->lock);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if(tty == NULL)
|
if(tty == NULL)
|
||||||
return IRQ_NONE;
|
return IRQ_NONE;
|
||||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user