powerpc: Rename LWSYNC_ON_SMP to PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER, ISYNC_ON_SMP to PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER
For performance reasons we are about to change ISYNC_ON_SMP to sometimes be lwsync. Now that the macro name doesn't make sense, change it and LWSYNC_ON_SMP to better explain what the barriers are doing. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
parent
66d99b8834
commit
f10e2e5b4b
@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ static inline int __mutex_cmpxchg_lock(atomic_t *v, int old, int new)
|
||||
PPC405_ERR77(0,%1)
|
||||
" stwcx. %3,0,%1\n\
|
||||
bne- 1b"
|
||||
ISYNC_ON_SMP
|
||||
PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER
|
||||
"\n\
|
||||
2:"
|
||||
: "=&r" (t)
|
||||
@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static inline int __mutex_dec_return_lock(atomic_t *v)
|
||||
PPC405_ERR77(0,%1)
|
||||
" stwcx. %0,0,%1\n\
|
||||
bne- 1b"
|
||||
ISYNC_ON_SMP
|
||||
PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER
|
||||
: "=&r" (t)
|
||||
: "r" (&v->counter)
|
||||
: "cc", "memory");
|
||||
@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static inline int __mutex_inc_return_unlock(atomic_t *v)
|
||||
int t;
|
||||
|
||||
__asm__ __volatile__(
|
||||
LWSYNC_ON_SMP
|
||||
PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER
|
||||
"1: lwarx %0,0,%1 # mutex unlock\n\
|
||||
addic %0,%0,1\n"
|
||||
PPC405_ERR77(0,%1)
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user