Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
efa631c26d x86, swiotlb: Simplify SWIOTLB pci_swiotlb_detect routine.
In 'pci_swiotlb_detect' we used to do two different things:
 a). If user provided 'iommu=soft' or 'swiotlb=force' we
     would set swiotlb=1 and return 1 (and forcing pci-dma.c
     to call pci_swiotlb_init() immediately).
 b). If 4GB or more would be detected and if user did not specify
     iommu=off, we would set 'swiotlb=1' and return whatever 'a)'
     figured out.

We simplify this by splitting a) and b) in two different routines.

CC: Fujita Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
LKML-Reference: <1282845485-8991-5-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2010-08-26 15:13:29 -07:00
FUJITA Tomonori
186a25026c x86: Split swiotlb initialization into two stages
The commit f4780ca005 moves
swiotlb initialization before dma32_free_bootmem(). It's
supposed to fix a bug that the commit
75f1cdf1dd introduced, we
initialize SWIOTLB right after dma32_free_bootmem so we wrongly
steal memory area allocated for GART with broken BIOS earlier.

However, the above commit introduced another problem, which
likely breaks machines with huge amount of memory. Such a box
use the majority of DMA32_ZONE so there is no memory for
swiotlb.

With this patch, the x86 IOMMU initialization sequence are:

1. We set swiotlb to 1 in the case of (max_pfn > MAX_DMA32_PFN
   && !no_iommu). If swiotlb usage is forced by the boot option,
   we go to the step 3 and finish (we don't try to detect IOMMUs).

2. We call the detection functions of all the IOMMUs. The
   detection function sets x86_init.iommu.iommu_init to the IOMMU
   initialization function (so we can avoid calling the
   initialization functions of all the IOMMUs needlessly).

3. We initialize swiotlb (and set dma_ops to swiotlb_dma_ops) if
   swiotlb is set to 1.

4. If the IOMMU initialization function doesn't need swiotlb
   (e.g. the initialization is sucessful) then sets swiotlb to zero.

5. If we find that swiotlb is set to zero, we free swiotlb
   resource.

Reported-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
LKML-Reference: <20091215204729A.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Tested-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-12-15 13:01:57 +01:00
FUJITA Tomonori
6959450e56 swiotlb: Remove duplicate swiotlb_force extern declarations
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com
LKML-Reference: <1258199198-16657-4-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-11-15 09:03:10 +01:00
FUJITA Tomonori
b18485e7ac swiotlb: Remove the swiotlb variable usage
POWERPC doesn't expect it to be used.

This fixes the linux-next build failure reported by
Stephen Rothwell:

  lib/swiotlb.c: In function 'setup_io_tlb_npages':
  lib/swiotlb.c:114: error: 'swiotlb' undeclared (first use in this function)

Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
LKML-Reference: <20091112000258F.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-11-11 16:51:18 +01:00
FUJITA Tomonori
1da4f9894c swiotlb: replace architecture-specific swiotlb.h with linux/swiotlb.h
Impact: cleanup

This replaces architecture-specific swiotlb.h (X86 and IA64) with
linux/swiotlb.h.

Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-12-28 10:04:00 +01:00
H. Peter Anvin
1965aae3c9 x86: Fix ASM_X86__ header guards
Change header guards named "ASM_X86__*" to "_ASM_X86_*" since:

a. the double underscore is ugly and pointless.
b. no leading underscore violates namespace constraints.

Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2008-10-22 22:55:23 -07:00
Al Viro
bb8985586b x86, um: ... and asm-x86 move
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2008-10-22 22:55:20 -07:00