wmb(), rmb() are not needed when writel(), readl() are used as
accessors for MMIO. We use them indirectly via iowrite32(),
ioread32().
What is needed mmiowb(), for synchronizing writes coming from
different CPUs on PCIe bridge (see in patch comments). This
fortunately is not needed on x86, where mmiowb() is just
defined as compiler barrier. As iwlwifi devices are most likely
not used on anything other than x86, this is not so important
fix.
Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Before we write to the device registers always check if
iwl_grap_nic_access() was successful.
On the way change return type of grab_nic_access() to bool, and add
likely()/unlikely() statement.
Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Print dump stack when the device is not responding. This should give
some more clue about the reason of failure. Also change the message we
print, since "MAC in deep sleep" is kinda confusing.
On the way add unlikely(), as fail to gain NIC access is hmm ...
unlikely.
Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
In "iwlwifi: consolidate the start_device flow"
the code flow changed and the firmware is now
loaded by the transport layer, but the change
unfortunately lost error checking -- restore.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
The sensitivity parameters are never modified, so they
should be const. Also remove the unused max_nrg_cck
value to save some space.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
There's no need to carry around the function
pointer when a boolean indicating that the
EEPROM stores enhanced TX power information
is sufficient.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
There's no need to have operations for
these as they simply depend on whether
the device has built-in bluetooth, so
just duplicate the information already
there (whether bt_params is present or
not).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
The PASSIVE_NO_RX workaround currently crosses
through the op_mode and transport layers, which
is a bit odd. This also isn't necessary, if the
transport simply reports when queues are full
(or no longer full) the op_mode can keep track
of this state, and report to mac80211 only what
*it* thinks is appropriate. What is appropriate
can then be based on whether queues should be
stopped to wait for RX or not.
This significantly simplifies the transport API,
it no longer needs to expose anything to stop a
queue, nor to wake "any" queue, this can all be
handled in the upper layer completely.
Also simplify the handling to not be dependent
on the context, that makes little sense as the
queues are shared and both contexts have to be
on the same channel anyway.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
There's not much point in passing priv and
hw pointers since they can be derived from
each other, and the function doesn't use
the hw pointer anyway. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
There's only one user, so the function
can be moved into the correct file. It
also loses an argument along the way.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Track freed FW blocks during Tx. If no blocks were freed during a
predefined timeout, initiate a HW recovery. This helps in situations
when the FW watchdog fails.
Don't trigger recovery during activities that can temporarily stop
Tx. This includes:
- scanning
- buffering packets for sleeping stations (AP role)
- ROC on any role
Signed-off-by: Arik Nemtsov <arik@wizery.com>
Signed-off-by: Eliad Peller <eliad@wizery.com>
Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <coelho@ti.com>
This function is only used in iwl-scan.c, so
if we move it up a little in the file it can
be made static.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Do some cleanups here:
* remove an unused prototype
* remove some unused constants
* clean up includes
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
No need to have a special config variable
for the PA type, we can just use the
additional NIC config function to config
the hardware correctly.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
The base packet structure will (hopefully) be
the same for all transports, but what is in it
differs. Remove the union of all the possible
contents and move the packet itself into the
transport header file. This requires changing
all users of the union to just use pkt->data.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Even if the variable might also be used by other
transports, there's no need for anything outside
of the transport itself to access it, so move it
into the private area.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
All variables related to uCode loading (the
waitqueue and done indication) should be in
the PCI-E transport's private data as this
is transport specific. Move them there.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
The transport doesn't really need to know as
we can enforce it in the command wrapper.
Move the ucode_owner variable into priv and
do all enforcing there.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
This will be sharable, but needs to live in the
op_mode as it is dependent on command processing.
Make a library out of the notification wait code.
Since I wrote all of the code originally and only
Intel employees changed it, we can also relicense
it to dual BSD/GPL.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
In "iwlwifi: consolidate the start_device flow"
Emmanuel added the return if the fw isn't there
but forgot to take into account that the struct
for notification wait needs to be added only
after the check -- fix that.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
The hardware config ht_params shouldn't be modified,
so copy the use_rts_for_aggregation parameter into
hw_params and use/modify it there.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
This is a hardware parameter, so it shouldn't
be configurable by the user. Users can disable
aggregation (which is the only thing affected)
with 11n_disable.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
When the command queue is full, the transport
will return -ENOSPC, but the reaction to that
depends on the op_mode. Virtualize that, the
DVM op_mode checks for CT-kill and restarts
the hardware otherwise.
We may be able to get rid of this callback by
putting the behaviour check into the wrapper
but that needs more careful evaluation.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Tracing used the priv pointer as an identifier,
which has the problem that we don't have it in
all code, and also some people say no pointers
should be "leaked" to userspace.
Use the device name instead, it is more useful
anyway.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
There's no need to copy shadow_reg_enable into
hw_params since it is a pure hardware parameter
that will never change, we can access it from
the config directly.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
As iwl_prepare_card_hw() is idempotent (and
many cards support AMT anyway) there's no
point in calling iwl_prepare_card_hw() only
for AMT capable devices -- call it always
and simplify the code that way.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
The transport layer should only check the
hardware RF kill status, not impose any
policy or reaction based on it, so move
that out of it into the op_mode.
For now keep the restriction on loading
firmware, that will have to be removed
later.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
The fact that the mutex must be held is an
implementation detail of DVM, but something
has to ensure that no two synchronous cmds
are submitted concurrently. Move the lockdep
assertion into the DVM-specific code, but
also make the transport abort if there are
two concurrently commands.
The assertion is much more useful though as
the transport check can only catch it when
it actually happens, while the assertion
makes sure it can't possibly happen.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Currently, we cannot send any commands when the
uCode is in RF or CT kill, but that will not be
true for all new uCode versions, so we need to
move the check into the uCode specific code.
Also remove the duplicate rfkill check.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
