Followup to commit dd2261ed45 ("hrtimer: Protect lockless access
to timer->base")
lock_hrtimer_base() fetches timer->base without lock exclusion.
Compiler is allowed to read timer->base twice (even if considered dumb)
which could end up trying to lock migration_base and return
&migration_base.
base = timer->base;
if (likely(base != &migration_base)) {
/* compiler reads timer->base again, and now (base == &migration_base)
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&base->cpu_base->lock, *flags);
if (likely(base == timer->base))
return base; /* == &migration_base ! */
Similarly the write sides must use WRITE_ONCE() to avoid store tearing.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191008173204.180879-1-edumazet@google.com
ff229eee3d