lk/linux-kernel-test
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

can: xilinx_can: fix the data update logic for CANFD FD frames

Browse Source 
commit c223da6893 ("can: xilinx_can: Add support for CANFD FD frames")
is writing data to a wrong offset for FD frames.

This patch fixes this issue.

Fixes: c223da6 ("can: xilinx_can: Add support for CANFD FD frames")
Reviewed-by: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@xilinx.com>
Reviewed-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta <Shubhrajyoti.datta@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Appana Durga Kedareswara rao <appana.durga.rao@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
Appana Durga Kedareswara rao
2019-08-12 15:36:44 +05:30
committed by Marc Kleine-Budde
parent 93bbd6c5ee
commit e6997dd268
1 changed files with 8 additions and 21 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

29
drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
View File

@@ -66,8 +66,7 @@ enum xcan_reg {
#define XCAN_FRAME_DLC_OFFSET(frame_base) ((frame_base) + 0x04)
#define XCAN_FRAME_DW1_OFFSET(frame_base) ((frame_base) + 0x08)
#define XCAN_FRAME_DW2_OFFSET(frame_base) ((frame_base) + 0x0C)
#define XCANFD_FRAME_DW_OFFSET(frame_base, n) (((frame_base) + 0x08) + \
((n) * XCAN_CANFD_FRAME_SIZE))
#define XCANFD_FRAME_DW_OFFSET(frame_base) ((frame_base) + 0x08)
#define XCAN_CANFD_FRAME_SIZE 0x48
#define XCAN_TXMSG_FRAME_OFFSET(n) (XCAN_TXMSG_BASE_OFFSET + \
@@ -589,7 +588,7 @@ static void xcan_write_frame(struct xcan_priv *priv, struct sk_buff *skb,
if (priv->devtype.cantype == XAXI_CANFD ||
priv->devtype.cantype == XAXI_CANFD_2_0) {
for (i = 0; i < cf->len; i += 4) {
ramoff = XCANFD_FRAME_DW_OFFSET(frame_offset, dwindex) +
ramoff = XCANFD_FRAME_DW_OFFSET(frame_offset) +
(dwindex * XCANFD_DW_BYTES);
priv->write_reg(priv, ramoff,
be32_to_cpup((__be32 *)(cf->data + i)));
@@ -805,10 +804,8 @@ static int xcanfd_rx(struct net_device *ndev, int frame_base)
struct net_device_stats *stats = &ndev->stats;
struct canfd_frame *cf;
struct sk_buff *skb;
u32 id_xcan, dlc, data[2] = {0, 0}, dwindex = 0, i, fsr, readindex;
u32 id_xcan, dlc, data[2] = {0, 0}, dwindex = 0, i, dw_offset;
fsr = priv->read_reg(priv, XCAN_FSR_OFFSET);
readindex = fsr & XCAN_FSR_RI_MASK;
id_xcan = priv->read_reg(priv, XCAN_FRAME_ID_OFFSET(frame_base));
dlc = priv->read_reg(priv, XCAN_FRAME_DLC_OFFSET(frame_base));
if (dlc & XCAN_DLCR_EDL_MASK)
@@ -852,26 +849,16 @@ static int xcanfd_rx(struct net_device *ndev, int frame_base)
/* Check the frame received is FD or not*/
if (dlc & XCAN_DLCR_EDL_MASK) {
for (i = 0; i < cf->len; i += 4) {
if (priv->devtype.flags & XCAN_FLAG_CANFD_2)
data[0] = priv->read_reg(priv,
(XCAN_RXMSG_2_FRAME_OFFSET(readindex) +
(dwindex * XCANFD_DW_BYTES)));
else
data[0] = priv->read_reg(priv,
(XCAN_RXMSG_FRAME_OFFSET(readindex) +
(dwindex * XCANFD_DW_BYTES)));
dw_offset = XCANFD_FRAME_DW_OFFSET(frame_base) +
(dwindex * XCANFD_DW_BYTES);
data[0] = priv->read_reg(priv, dw_offset);
*(__be32 *)(cf->data + i) = cpu_to_be32(data[0]);
dwindex++;
}
} else {
for (i = 0; i < cf->len; i += 4) {
if (priv->devtype.flags & XCAN_FLAG_CANFD_2)
data[0] = priv->read_reg(priv,
XCAN_RXMSG_2_FRAME_OFFSET(readindex) +
i);
else
data[0] = priv->read_reg(priv,
XCAN_RXMSG_FRAME_OFFSET(readindex) + i);
dw_offset = XCANFD_FRAME_DW_OFFSET(frame_base);
data[0] = priv->read_reg(priv, dw_offset + i);
*(__be32 *)(cf->data + i) = cpu_to_be32(data[0]);
}
}